<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Coppicing on Aneesh Sathe</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/tags/coppicing/</link><description>Recent content in Coppicing on Aneesh Sathe</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://aneeshsathe.com/tags/coppicing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>On Thickets, Enclosure, and Leaving</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/on-thickets-enclosure-and-leaving/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aneeshsathe.com/on-thickets-enclosure-and-leaving/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past few months I have discovered and &lt;a href="https://aneeshsathe.com/logic-of-the-thicket-and-the-unsearchable-web/"&gt;written about the idea of thickets&lt;/a&gt; and have been wondering what the practice of thicketing looks like. At its core the idea behind thicketing is to create and dwell in systems that resist capture and defy legibility. Weirdly this is not some anti-establishment move but a simple desire to just be and return to a state where you had your own corner, your friends, and your thoughts. Over the past few hundred years, with the ascent of modernity, legibility and legibilizing have been treated as the norm and a default good thing. However the pattern which has emerged (not just on the internet) is that &lt;a href="https://substack.com/@contraptions/note/c-297601565?r=1lmu7t"&gt;systems position themselves as commons&lt;/a&gt;, invite people to enjoy themselves and slowly initiate capture mechanisms under the guise of some or the other security. Not all of this is bad, much of the modern world would not function without security and minimal enclosures.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>