<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Creativity on Aneesh Sathe</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/tags/creativity/</link><description>Recent content in Creativity on Aneesh Sathe</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 06:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://aneeshsathe.com/tags/creativity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Better Company Than Caesar</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/better-company-than-caesar/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 06:06:22 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aneeshsathe.com/better-company-than-caesar/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What is this urge that makes us want to be seen as something we aren’t. Take this blog, for example. I am in no way a writer. Barely even a proper blogger. My professional life has very little of this kind of writing. Scientific and investor communication, sure; but not this. Why do I have — and always have had — this urge to be, and be seen, as creative? Is this some kind of performative, effortless polymathism?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Hack, Hacky, Hacker</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/hack-hacky-hacker/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 06:21:48 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aneeshsathe.com/hack-hacky-hacker/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few days ago I wrote about the beauty of &lt;a href="https://aneeshsathe.com/divine-documentation/"&gt;great documentation&lt;/a&gt;; this is the evil twin post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The spectrum of meaning across the words &lt;em&gt;hack, hacky, and hacker&lt;/em&gt; form a horseshoe when thinking about postures toward life. On either ends are the most difficult options. Being either a hack or a hacker requires dedication and both approaches narrow your world. Being hacky, taking imperfect shortcuts, in the world is immensely satisfying. It is play disguised as problem solving.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>On Being Good vs. Knowing Good: Perspectives on AI</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/being-good-vs-knowing-good-ai/</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:41:07 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aneeshsathe.com/being-good-vs-knowing-good-ai/</guid><description>&lt;figure &gt;
 










 
 &lt;img src="https://aneeshsathe.com/media/2024/04/image.png" alt="Image"&gt;
 




&lt;/figure&gt;


&lt;p&gt;In this &lt;a href="https://youtu.be/iGJcF4bLKd4?si=sehYAGqoKw-HUyFc"&gt;video&lt;/a&gt;, Stephen Fry narrates Nick Cave&amp;rsquo;s letter, which argues that using ChatGPT as a shortcut to creativity is detrimental. Surprisingly, I found myself in agreement. Having been involved in the AI industry for over a decade, I&amp;rsquo;ve always viewed AI positively. As an entrepreneur who pitches AI to investors and customers, I liken AI to technologies like spreadsheets: they eliminate tedious tasks, but you still need to understand what you&amp;rsquo;re doing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>