<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Technology on Aneesh Sathe</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/tags/technology/</link><description>Recent content in Technology on Aneesh Sathe</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 02:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://aneeshsathe.com/tags/technology/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Deep Dark Terroir of the Soul</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/the-deep-dark-terroir-of-the-soul/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 02:17:37 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aneeshsathe.com/the-deep-dark-terroir-of-the-soul/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the third and final part of the &lt;em&gt;Thicket&lt;/em&gt; Series:&lt;br&gt;
Part 1: &lt;a href="https://aneeshsathe.com/logic-of-the-thicket-and-the-unsearchable-web/"&gt;Logic of the Thicket and the Unsearchable Web&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Part 2: &lt;a href="https://aneeshsathe.com/the-architecture-of-resistance/"&gt;The Architecture of Resistance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The history of the working subject might be best understood not as a ledger of wages or a sequence of industrial breakthroughs, but as a study in the migration of the Master. In the eighteenth century, the Master was a concrete presence, a figure residing in the castle or the cathedral, distinct from the worker by a physical and social chasm. One knew where the authority lived because one could see the smoke from its chimneys. By the nineteenth century, this figure had moved into the factory office, closer to the rhythm of the machine but still identifiable by the suit and the watch. The twentieth century saw a further dissolution; the Master became atmospheric, blending into the very walls of the institutions that housed us—the schools, the hospitals, the barracks.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Shelter as Epistemic Engine</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/the-shelter-as-epistemic-engine/</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 06:35:42 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aneeshsathe.com/the-shelter-as-epistemic-engine/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a continuation of my ongoing exploration of places and spaces. Previously: &lt;a href="https://aneeshsathe.com/we-need-homes-in-the-delta-sector/"&gt;We need homes in the delta quadrant&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://aneeshsathe.com/thinking-with-places/"&gt;Thinking with places&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://aneeshsathe.com/problems-are-places-questions-are-spaces/"&gt;Problems are places questions are spaces&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id="introduction-the-terror-of-the-open-field"&gt;
Introduction: The Terror of the Open Field
&lt;a href="#introduction-the-terror-of-the-open-field" class="heading-anchor"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We tend to think of &amp;ldquo;Space&amp;rdquo; as a vacuum—an emptiness waiting to be filled. But geographically and philosophically, Space is actually a condition of high-entropy potential. As Yi-Fu Tuan famously articulated, space is &amp;ldquo;freedom,&amp;rdquo; but it is also &amp;ldquo;possibility without orientation.&amp;rdquo; It is the open field where everything is possible, which means nothing is yet distinct.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Work or Play? Ludic Feedback Loops</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/work-or-play-ludic-feedback-loops/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:57:58 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aneeshsathe.com/work-or-play-ludic-feedback-loops/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In his substack post today, &lt;a href="https://substack.com/home/post/p-169315273"&gt;Venkatesh Rao wrote&lt;/a&gt; about reading and writing in the age of LLMs as playing and making toys respectively. In one part he writes about how the dopamine feedback loop from writing drove his switch from engineering to writing. For him, writing has ludic, play-like, qualities.&lt;/p&gt;


 &lt;figure &gt;
 










 
 &lt;img src="https://aneeshsathe.com/media/2025/07/image-from-rawpixel-id-525473-jpeg.jpg" alt="Image"&gt;
 




&lt;/figure&gt;


&lt;p&gt;I have made almost all my “career” decisions as a function of play. I originally started off with a deep love of plants, how to grow them and their impact on the world. I was convinced I was going to have a lot of fun. I did have some. My wonderful undergrad professor literally hand held me through my first experiments growing tobacco plants from seeds. But that was about it. My next experiment was with woody plants and growing the seeds alone took 6 months, and by the end I had 4 measly leaves to experiment with. I quickly switched to cell biology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What do platforms really do?</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/what-do-platforms-really-do/</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 05:51:44 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aneeshsathe.com/what-do-platforms-really-do/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In 1986, David S. Landes wrote the essay, &amp;lsquo;What Do Bosses Really Do?’. He argues that the historical role of the &amp;lsquo;boss&amp;rsquo; was an essential function for organizing production and connecting producers to markets. Digital platforms have become the new bosses. Platforms have the same functions of market creation, labor specialization, and management, but they have replaced the physical factory floor with &lt;em&gt;algorithmic management&lt;/em&gt;. While their methods are novel, platforms are the direct descendants of the merchant-entrepreneurs and factory owners Landes described, solving the same historical problems of production in remarkably similar ways.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Good Dictionary</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/a-good-dictionary/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 06:35:42 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aneeshsathe.com/a-good-dictionary/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday &lt;a href="https://aneeshsathe.com/divine-documentation/"&gt;I wrote&lt;/a&gt; about good documentation opening doors to options you didn’t realize you had. In the book &lt;em&gt;On Writing Well&lt;/em&gt; Zinsser mentions how one of his key tools is the dictionary. That got me curious about the limitations about the dictionaries available to us. This is not just about the dictionary on the bookshelf but the ones that we have in-context access to. The ones on our computer and phones.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Chatbots, Bats &amp;amp; Broken Oracles</title><link>https://aneeshsathe.com/chatbots-bats-broken-oracles/</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 05:54:05 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aneeshsathe.com/chatbots-bats-broken-oracles/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I had the strangest conversation with my son today. There used to be a time when computers never made a mistake. It was always the user that was in error. The computer did exactly  what you asked it to do. If something went wrong it was you, the user, that didn’t know what you wanted. After decades of that being etched in today I found myself telling him that computers make mistakes, you have to check if the computer has done the right thing and that is actually ok. A computer that hallucinates also provides a surface for exploration and seeking answers to questions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>