Venkatesh Rao on Aneesh Sathe

Nakatomi Drift

Sun, 02 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000

I’ve been muddling through ways to stay interesting – to myself and friends – in the age of AI. Part of the answer, I have come to understand, is the construction of Thickets. Dreaming up such a thing without a way to traverse it kept the idea incomplete. One nagging thought was that it was important to get properly lost – as opposed to trivially lost. That feeling where you had a good sense of where you were, but a question you asked or a connection you made has left you in unfamiliar territory. Excitingly so.

On Thickets, Enclosure, and Leaving

Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000

Over the past few months I have discovered and written about the idea of thickets and have been wondering what the practice of thicketing looks like. At its core the idea behind thicketing is to create and dwell in systems that resist capture and defy legibility. Weirdly this is not some anti-establishment move but a simple desire to just be and return to a state where you had your own corner, your friends, and your thoughts. Over the past few hundred years, with the ascent of modernity, legibility and legibilizing have been treated as the norm and a default good thing. However the pattern which has emerged (not just on the internet) is that systems position themselves as commons, invite people to enjoy themselves and slowly initiate capture mechanisms under the guise of some or the other security. Not all of this is bad, much of the modern world would not function without security and minimal enclosures.

The Birth of Thickets

Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000

The legibility regime runs one operation. It converts Space into Place, and everything else it does follows from that.

Space is the undifferentiated field. It holds every possibility and offers no orientation, which is why standing in it feels less like freedom than like vertigo. Draw a boundary around part of it, name what is inside, and you have made a Place. A farm is a Place; beyond the fence is forest. Drawing that boundary is the first act of thought, because you cannot know anything you have not first cut out from everything else. The trouble begins when the operation runs everywhere, on everything, at once, until it stops being thought and becomes weather.

Not My Lever

Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000

I. A burden no one could carry alone #

Some time around the year 170, in a tent on the Danube frontier, the emperor Marcus Aurelius wrote in Greek to himself: Be like the headland against which the waves continually break, but stands firm and tames the fury of the water round it. The empire was at war with the Marcomanni. The Antonine Plague had reached the army. His children were dying one after another; of his thirteen, only one would outlive him to any consequence.

The Lightening of Intent

Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000

I. Ceolfrith on the road #

In late spring 716, an English abbot named Ceolfrith left the twin monastery of Wearmouth-Jarrow in Northumbria for the city of Rome. He was seventy-four. He carried with him a manuscript Bible, the Codex Amiatinus, which he intended to present as a gift to Pope Gregory II. The Codex contained the entire Latin Bible in two volumes, weighed about seventy-five pounds, and required something close to one thousand calfskins to produce. Ceolfrith had commissioned three of these “pandects” at his abbey; this was the survivor he meant to deliver in person. The other two pandects are lost. The Codex Amiatinus was misattributed to a sixth-century Italian scribe for more than a thousand years; only in 1888 did Giovanni Battista de Rossi establish that the dedication page had been altered and the manuscript was Northumbrian work. He died at Langres in eastern Burgundy on 25 September 716, six months into the journey, before reaching Rome. His companions carried the Codex on. It sits today in the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana in Florence and is the oldest complete Latin Bible in the world.

The Viscous Frontier

Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000

Escherichia coli Bacterium (2021, revised 2022). Illustration by David S. Goodsell, RCSB Protein Data Bank. doi:10.2210/rcsb_pdb/goodsell-gallery-028.

I. #

In May 1976 a Satawalese master navigator named Mau Piailug stood on the deck of a double-hulled Polynesian canoe in Honolua Bay, Maui, and prepared to sail to Tahiti. Sans compass, chronometer, and chart. The canoe was Hōkūleʻa, a replica of the voyaging craft that had carried Polynesians across the Pacific a thousand years earlier. Over the next thirty-four days Piailug would navigate her about two thousand three hundred nautical miles south-southeast to Papeete using the rising and setting positions of stars, the shape of ocean swells refracted off islands beyond the horizon, the colour of the water at dusk, and the behaviour of terns returning to land at evening.

The Cosmos and the Model

Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000

I. The Averaging Machine #

In 2025, researchers at USC ran a study that produced a result nobody expected. Atari et al., “AI-Powered Homogenization of Scientific Reasoning,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2026). They gave people reasoning tasks, some with LLM assistance, some without. Individual performance improved. Every metric showed it: more accurate responses, faster completion, fewer errors. The LLM made each person better.

Then they looked at the groups.

The Octotypic Mind

Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000

The Scholars of Dejima #

In the 1770s, a samurai, a physician, and a Confucian scholar gathered around a Dutch anatomy textbook none of them could properly read. They were attempting a translation of the Tabulae Anatomicae. Sugita Genpaku and his collaborators, the rangaku-sha, “Dutch studies scholars” of Tokugawa Japan. The shogunate had sealed the country for over a century. European knowledge trickled in through one pinhole: the Dutch trading post on Dejima, a fan-shaped artificial island in Nagasaki harbor.

The End of Identity: AI, Plasticity, and the Divergence Machine

Sun, 08 Mar 2026 06:28:21 +0000

Over the past year, the Contraptions club has been reading through history—from Giordano Bruno and Montaigne to Spinoza, Adam Smith, and Hume. We are now using using Venkatesh Rao’s Divergence Machine framework as a lens to make sense of the modern world.
For context, Venkat posits that human history operates through massive “world machines”. The “modernity machine” was constructed around 1200 and operated at a steady plateau of capability from 1600 to 2000. It is now in a state of rapid, partially scheduled disassembly. In its place, the “divergence machine” was constructed around 1600 and has been operating in fully deployed mode for about 25 years.
Looking at this transition through the philosophers we’ve studied, my feeling is that over the centuries, we’ve witnessed a gradual peeling back of the layers of imagination that were once heavily layered on top of nature. We can map this peeling back directly to Rao’s divergence concepts.

The Shelter as Epistemic Engine

Wed, 17 Dec 2025 06:35:42 +0000

This is a continuation of my ongoing exploration of places and spaces. Previously: We need homes in the delta quadrant, Thinking with places, Problems are places questions are spaces.

Introduction: The Terror of the Open Field #

We tend to think of “Space” as a vacuum—an emptiness waiting to be filled. But geographically and philosophically, Space is actually a condition of high-entropy potential. As Yi-Fu Tuan famously articulated, space is “freedom,” but it is also “possibility without orientation.” It is the open field where everything is possible, which means nothing is yet distinct.